HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 651 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nishant Shukla, Rajesh Kumar Agnihotri Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ashish Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Secondary Edu. Civil Sectt.Lko.Andanr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench