GAYATRI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
/10866/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177232 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177232 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10866 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Case has been called out. No one has appeared for the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents is present.
2. Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions received has submitted that as per report of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ayodhya, the petitioner who is patta holder is in possession of the disputed land and he has also carried out constructions over the land in question.
3. In the light of written instructions, received from Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ayodhya, no further directions are required to be passed in the present case. The written instructions are taken on record.
4. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of in terms of written instructions received from Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ayodhya. December 2, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Gayatri And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench