Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177226 (ALL)

SATYA PRAKASH THRU. MUKHTARAAM SHIVAM SHARMA v. SHRI KAMLESH KUMAR GOYAL ADDL. DISTT. MAIGISTRATE/ COMPETENT AUTH. URBAN LAND CELLING LKO. AND ANR.

CAPL/1669/2025 · 2025-12-01

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1669 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Case has been called in the revised list. Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case. In view of above, the contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Notice, if any, stands discharged. December 1, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Upadhyay, Anil Kumar Yadav, Diksha Tiwari, Saurabh Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Satya Prakash Thru. Mukhtaraam Shivam Sharma .....Applicant(s) Shri Kamlesh Kumar Goyal Addl. Distt. Maigistrate/ Competent Auth. Urban Land Celling Lko. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench