PANKAJ KUMAR DIXIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/10542/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10542 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Neeraj Pandey, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2. 3. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 14.07.2019 as well as order dated 09.09.2020 passed in Case No. 1670 of 2020 arising out of F.I.R. No. 183 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 427 I.P.C., P.S. Phardhan, District Kheri. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submit that in pursuance of the earlier order dated 31.10.2025 passed in Application u/s 482 No. 945 of 2021, the matter was sent before the court below for verification of the compromise deed. 5. It is evident from the record that the factum of the compromise has been verified by the court below vide his report dated
11.11.2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. fairly concedes that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pankaj Kumar Dixit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
by the court below. 7. Hon'ble Apex Court, in catena of decisions, viz., Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further and the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter any further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. 10.
Charge sheet dated 14.07.2019 as well as order dated 09.09.2020 passed in Case No. 1670 of 2020 arising out of F.I.R. No. 183 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 427 I.P.C., P.S. Phardhan, District Kheri are hereby quashed. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned, forthwith. December 16, 2025 VKS A482 No. 10542 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench