PUTTAN KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1308/2025 · 2025-12-01
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177193 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177193 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1308 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Range Case No.14/2023-24 under Sections 33, 63 of Indian Forest Act, Police Station Gola, District Kheri.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is an old person of 67 years and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the complaint. The applicant has no previous criminal history. He submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, but he could not dispute the above contention made by learned counsel for the applicant. Considering the above aspects of the matter and the fact that there is no such criminal history of the applicant as is mentioned in the present case and without entering into the merit of the case, it would be appropriate to grant protection to the applicant under Section 482 BNSS till filing of the police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. In the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned. The applicant shall cooperate in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheeraj Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Puttan Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the investigation and he will not influence the witnesses. The accused- applicant will remain present as and when the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned call for investigation/interrogation. The applicant be released with further following conditions:- (i) That the applicant shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (Ill) That the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; and (iv) Such other conditions as may be imposed under sub-section (3) of Section 437, as if the bail was granted under that section. With the above observation/direction, the anticipatory bail application is
disposed of. December 1, 2025 Sachin ABAIL No. 1308 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench