1 2025:CGHC:19083 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 3223 of 2025 Ravi Sharma S/o Kamal Sharma Aged About 34 Years R/o Anand Aasray Apartment Sector -02 Greater Noida Police Station Beeta, 2 District - Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Exise Circle Bilha District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rahul Goswami, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 28/04/2025 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 217/2025 registered at Police Station Exise Circle Bilha District - Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 34(1) A, 34(2), 36 and and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act. AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN 2 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 10.02.2025, as per secret information received from the informant, the Police of Police Station Exise Circle Bilha District – Bilaspur (C.G.) seized total 86.4 bulk liters of foreign liquor from the possession of applicant, which were kept in Car bearing registration No. UP-37-X-4803, thereafter, aforesaid offence has been registered against the applicant. Hence, the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and 86.4 bulk liters of foreign liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. He also submits that the applicant has one criminal antecedent of the year 2025 under the IPC, he is in jail since 11.02.2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court and the applicant has two criminal antecedents under the IPC, out of which, one is of the year 2022 and another is of the year 2025. He further submits that 86.4 bulk liters of foreign liquor was recovered from the possession of the applicant, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 3 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has two criminal antecedents, which are of the years 2022 and 2025 under the IPC, he has no criminal antecedent under the Excise Act and NDPS Act, he is in jail since 11.02.2025 and the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case, further the conclusion of the trial may take some more time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Let the applicant - Ravi Sharma, involved in Crime No. 217/2025 registered at Police Station Exise Circle Bilha District - Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 34(1) A, 34(2), 36 and and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufÏcient 4 cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufÏcient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. OfÏce is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Akhil