Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177166 (MAD)

Vignesh @ Solution Vicky v. State rep by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/32006/2025 · 2025-11-24

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.32006 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.32006 of 2025 Vignesh @ Solution Vicky ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, H-5 New Washermanpet Police Station, Chennai – 600 081. (Crime No.236 of 2023) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.236 of 2023 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Kalaikumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.07.2025, seeks bail in S.C.No.247 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302 of IPC, in Crime No.236 of 2023, registered on the file of the respondent. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.32006 of 2025 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is facing trial in S.C.No.247 of 2024 on the file of the learned XV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai and subsequently, he had not appeared before the trial Court, and non-bailable warrant was issued on 26.11.2024 and the same was executed on 27.07.2025. He also submitted that the petitioner will undertake that hereafter he will regularly appear before the trial court on all hearing dates and also stated that he is prepared to comply with any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner. 3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that apart from this case, petitioner has four previous cases. 4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner has four previous cases and this petitioner absented for more than 8 months and if he is released on bail it will stall the trial process, hence this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.32006 of 2025 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 24.11.2025 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, H-5 New Washermanpet Police Station, Chennai – 600 081. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.32006 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J. sma Crl.O.P.No.32006 of 2025 24.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis