DINESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/1346/2025 · 2025-11-06
Rajiv Gupta, Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177151 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177151 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1346 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
1. Despite mention being made by the petitioners, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
2. Per contra, learned AGA has submitted that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted on 09.03.2025 in favour of the petitioner and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. In view of the submission made, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 6, 2025 NSC Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambrish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Dinesh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench