BADAL SHUKLA @ JITIN SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/9781/2025 · 2025-11-19
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177145 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177145 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9781 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in nine cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as follows:
"i. Case Crime No.62 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur, ii. Case Crime No.63 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 427, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur, iii. Case Crime No.97 of 2020, under Sections 188, 269, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 56 Disaster Management Act and Section 3 Epidemic Diseases Act, Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Badal Shukla @ Jitin Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
iv. Case Crime No.275 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur, v. Case Crime No.124 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 325 I.P.C. Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur, vi.Case Crime No.348 of 2024, under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(3), 352 B.N.S. Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur, vii. Case Crime No.188 of 2025, under Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur, viii.Case Crime No.38 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 324(4), 333, 351(3), 352 B.N.S. Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur and ix.Case Crime No.187 of 2025, under Sections 109, 308(5), 3(5) B.N.S. Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur. 4.
It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other eight cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. November 19, 2025 Preeti A482 No. 9781 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench