Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17714 (RAJ)

SHOBHIT AGARWAL S/O SURENDRA KUMAR GARG, B/C MAHAJAN v. SMT NEHA JAIN W/O SHOBHIT AGRAWAL D/O JAYANT KUMAR JAIN B/C AGRAWAL

XOBJC/18/2018 · 2025-05-23

Avneesh Jhingan, Mukesh Rajpurohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21809-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 359/2018 Shobhit Agarwal S/o Surendra Kumar Garg, ----Appellant Versus Smt Neha Jain W/o Shohit Agarwal D/o Jayant Kumar Jain ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Cross Objection (Civil) No. 18/2018 Shobhit Agarwal S/o Surendra Kumar Garg, ----Appellant Versus Smt Neha Jain W/o Shobhit Agrawal D/o Jayant Kumar Jain ----Respondent D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 805/2018 Neha Jain W/o Shri Shobhit Agarwal D/o Shri Jayant Kumar Jain, ----Appellant Versus Shri Shobhit Agarwal S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Garg ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rohan Agarwal for Mr. Rajat Ranjan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 23/05/2025 Learned counsel for the parties are at ad idem that during the pendency of the appeals, the wife has expired. In view of the above, the appeals as well as cross-objection are disposed of as infructuous. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /58-60