Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE CHALLA WRIT PETITION NO: 12551 OF 7C)0ti :: AMARAV Of m 'ft: o MAY xli nr gunaranjan Between:
1. Chegireddy Sirisha, D/o. Peddarami Assistant, R/o. Bhogolu Grama Prakasam District. Reddy, Aged 36 years, Occ Field Panchayat, Ardhaveedu Mandal,
2. Darla Prasad, S/o. Papaiah Aged 39 years, Occ field Asistant Donakonda Grama Panchayat, Ardhaveedu
3. Marri Ravi, S/o. Pedda Nagaiah, Aged 35 Rangapuram Grama , R/o. Mandal, Prakasam District. years, Occ field Asistant, R/o. Panchayat, Ardhaveedu Mandal Prakasam District. 4. Parimilla Sheker, S/o. Chinna Ramaiah, Aged 37 years, Occ field Assistant, R/o. Yachavaram Grama Panchayat, Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...PETITIONERS AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner, Secretariat Panchayat Raj and Rural Development A.P, Vijayawada. 3. The District Collector/District Project Coordinator Prakasam District at ongole. 4- The Project Director -cum- Joint Secretary, District Water Management Agency (MGNREGS), DWMA, Prakasam District at Ongole. , MGNREGS, DWMA
5. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer/Programme Officer, Mandal Y^raja Parishad, MGNREGS, A.P. Rural Development Department, ' Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District. 6. The Additional Programme Officer, Office of the Mandal Parishad Development Office, MGNREGS, A.P. Rural Development Department, B-peta Cluster, Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order direction declaring the orders vide Rc.No.D2/527/EGS/2024 or dt. 15.04.2025 (4) issued by the Respondent No.4 in terminating the petitioners from the post of Field Assistant of Bhogolu Gramapanchayat petitioner, Donakonda Gramapanchayat of 2 Gramapancyat of 3’’*^ petitioner and Yachavaram Gramapanchyat petitioner without affording any opportunity, without following any procedure, without conducting any grama sabha and passed psychlostone orders illegal, arbitrary and set aside the of 1 nd petitioner, Rangapuram of 4*^ IS same, consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioners as Field Assistants respective Grama Panchayats. in their lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders vide Rc.No.D2/527/EGS/202 dt.
15 04.2025 as Field petitioner, Donakonda petitioner, Rangapuram Gramapancyat of S'"* petitioner and Yachavaram Gramapanchyat of 4*'' petitioner at Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. (4) issued by the Respondent No.4 by continuing the petitioners Assistants in Bhogolu Gramapanchayat of 1 Gramapanchayat of 2 nd
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI N. ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR SERVICES Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI M.S.R. CHANDRA MURTHY, SC FOR MGNREGS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6: M/s. B.V.APARNA LAKSHMI I ,SC FOR ZPP, MPP & GRAM PANCHAYAT The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010242672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 12551/2025 Between; Chegireddy Sirisha and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S);
1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S)
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition with better affidavit.
2. Permission as sought for is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file fresh writ petition. No order as to costs.
2 A- As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
Sd/-G.HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri N. Aswartha Narayana, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri M.S.R. Chandra Murthy, SC for MGNREGS[OPUC One CC to M/s.B.V. Aparna Lakshmi, SC forZPP, MPP & Gram Panchayat[OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Services-I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies.
2.
3.
4.
5. ssb
t’ HIGH COURT DATED:07/05/2025
ORDER WP.No.12551 of 2025 ^ 3 1JUL 2025 )S <*» rrwtSectioaxC^ £AT DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS