Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177138 (ALL)

RAKSHARAM MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DIRECTOR BASIC EDU. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/13458/2025 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13458 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3, Mr. Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties specially 2 to 4 give the benefit of order government order dated 21.10.2024 and pension be revised accordingly with reasonable interest with arrears. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, District- Bahraich to consider and decide the representation dated 08.03.2025 in stipulated time. III. Issue any other Writ, Order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IV. Allow the writ petition with cost." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kumar Ayush Raksharam Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Director Basic Edu. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 10 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 2/District Basic Education Officer, Bahraich, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 20, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 13458 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench