HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6635 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Prabhu Sharan, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. Keeping in view the reliefs sought and the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the opposite parties is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Hardoi to decide the Regular Suit No.175 of 2010: Syed Ali Nawab Zaidi and others Vs. Smt. Nargis Bano and others expeditiously. 4. The aforesaid suit was filed by the opposite parties no.1 to 6 against the petitioner and the opposite parties no.7 to 10 for a decree of perpetual injunction and the learned trial court has passed an order dated 14.09.2010 directing the parties to maintain status-quo. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the plaintiffs have transferred the property in dispute in violation of the order dated 14.09.2010. The temporary injunction order is still operative. 6. In these circumstances, the petition is disposed of and a direction is issued to learned Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Hardoi to decide the Regular Suit No.175 of 2010: Syed Ali Nawab Zaidi and others Vs. Smt. Nargis Bano and others expeditiously in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. November 14, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhu Sharan, Shashi Kant Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Kalimuddeen .....Petitioner(s) Syed Ali Nawab Zaidi And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench