HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1852 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.352 of 2025 registered on 28.8.2025 under Sections 305, 331(3), 112(2) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Bahraich. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the FIR and no recovery is made from his possession rather the name of the applicant has come into light from the statement of co-accused Arbaz Ali, Sushil Gupta, Prashant Rastogi and Suresh Pasi, who were arrested by the police on 4.8.2025. The applicant has no criminal history as is mentioned in the present case, however, the applicant has one case against him which has been lodged under Sections 147, 148, 323, 336, 352, 504, 506 IPC at FIR/Case Crime No.50 of 2020 in which has been bailed out. He further submits that there is no evidence against the applicant. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, but he could not dispute the fact that the applicant is not named in the FIR. Considering the above aspects of the matter and the fact that there is no such criminal history of the applicant as is mentioned in the present case and without entering into the merit of the case, it would be appropriate to grant protection to the applicant under Section 482 BNSS till filing of the police Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rehan Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jishan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. In the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned. The applicant shall cooperate in the investigation and he will not influence the witnesses. The accused-applicant will remain present as and when the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned call for investigation/interrogation. The applicant be released with further following conditions:- (i) That the applicant shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (Ill) That the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; and (iv) Such other conditions as may be imposed under sub-section (3) of Section 437, as if the bail was granted under that section. With the above observation/direction, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of. November 28, 2025 Sachin NABAIL No. 1852 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench