RAKESH TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF CO-OPERATIVE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/10238/2025 · 2025-12-05
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10238 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Prakhar Nigam, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3, Mr. Anurag Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"I) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. party no. 2 and 3 to make payment of post retrial dues such as gratuity, leave encashment and arrear etc., and other admissible benefits as per law to petitioner forthwith. 11) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. Party no. 2 & 3 to make payment of interest to petitioner on delayed payment of post retrial dues from due date till the date of actual payment at the rate of 18% per annum or at prevailing rate; III) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. Party no. 2 & 3 to provide interest @ 18% on delayed payment of provident fund and group insurance from the date of retirement (31.05.2024) to actual payment on dated
17.07.2025. IV) Issue any other writ order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of case; costs of petition be awarded to petitioner. V) Costs of petition be awarded to petitioner." The contentions put forth by learned counsel for the petitioner is that after the retirement certain dues have been paid, but the other retiral dues are still Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghvendra P. Singh, Shashank Vikram Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anurag Kumar Singh Rakesh Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Co- Operative Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
to be paid to the petitioner. He submitted that he may be given liberty to raise claim of rest of the retiral dues, before respondent no. 4 and he may be
directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representaion within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 4/Secretary/Chief Executive Officer, Hardoi, District Co-operative Bank Ltd., District Hardoi, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. December 5, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 10238 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench