KASHIRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WPIL/1047/2025 · 2025-10-31
Jaspreet Singh
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177110 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177110 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1047 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. The instant petition has been preferred in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation claiming the following reliefs:-
"I. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite party nos.2 to 4 to maintain the Chak Marg in Gata No.2163/0.129 by paving the bricks/ interlocking upon it from Hantusingh Purva Dahar to Surapur link road, in order to smooth movement on the Chak Mark for public utility connect to link road, situated at village Anakaripur Bahar, Pargana Amsin Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya. II. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite party nos.2 to 4 decide the representation dated 20.09.2025 within stipulated time by a reasoned and speaking order as contained in Annexure No.3 to this Writ Petition."
2. The record indicates that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.10.2025 had required the learned counsel for the respondent no.5 to seek instructions and may also file a counter- affidavit. 3. Today, the learned Standing Counsel Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi has filed an affidavit and Shri Mohan Singh learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.5 has also filed a short counter- affidavit. Both are taken on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Nishad, Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Kashiram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Considering the counter-affidavit filed by the State which is sworn by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ayodhaya, it has categorically been stated that a Revenue Team was constituted who has visited the site on 15.10.2025 and it was found that certain adjacent tenure holders had encroached upon the chak marg. After due demarcation, the chak marg was freed from all encroachments and the same was also handed over to the respondent no.5 i.e. the Land Management Committee for the purpose of maintaining the chak road. 5.
Similarly, in the affidavit and short counter-affidavit filed by the respondent no.5, it has been stated that after having received the unencraoched chak marg relating to Gata No.2163, situate in village Anakaripur Bahar, Pargana Amsin, Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya, the work relating to filling of earth has commenced which is likely to be completed by December 2025 and thereafter interlocking tiles would be placed subject to availability of funds which is expected to be completed by December 2025. In this view of the matter, the grievance as noticed stands redressed. No further orders are required. 6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. October 31, 2025 ank WPIL No. 1047 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench