Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17710 (PAT)

Sanjeev Kumar Ray @ Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/17433/2017 · 2025-07-28

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17433 of 2017 ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar Ray @ Sanjeev Kumar Son of Late Yadunandan Ray, resident of Village- Baheri, P.O. Baheri, P.S. Baheri, Anchal- Baheri, District- Darbhanga Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Commissioner, Koshi Pramandal, Darbhanga, Bihar. 3. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga, Bihar. 4. The Additional Collector, Darbhanga, Bihar. 5. D.C.L.R., Darbhanga, Bihar. 6. The S.D.O., Darbhanga, Bihar. 7. The C.O., Baheri Anchal, Office Under District- Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kedar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 28-07-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) For enhance of an appropriate Writ/Writs, order/orders and direction/directions against authorities concern. (ii) For giving land in possession to the petitioner and his rest two brothers that area is of 1 Katha 17 Dhur belongs to the Mouza Baheri, Khata No.520, Gair Mazarua Aam, Patna High Court CWJC No.17433 of 2017(3) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 Khesra (plot) No.9432 Parti Kadim, as its Chauhaddi is North Plot No.. 7472, South- Dasai Barhi and others, East- Ramdeo Mahto and another, West- Road. (iii) For issuing a Parcha of land in question as shown above. (iv) For any other relief/reliefs to which petitioner with his brothers may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition in the presence of the learned State counsel. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U