- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22615 WP No. 16528 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 16528 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M H PARAMESHWARAPPA S/O LATE M.B. HANUMANTHAPPA & M/O LATE HANUMANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O KONDAPURA VILLAGE POST JANTHIKOLALU, KASABA HOBI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 554. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOPALAKRISHNAMURTHY C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. H BHYRASIDDAPPA S/O LATE M.B. HANUMANTHAPPA & M/O LATE HANUMANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. S.B. ABHISHEKH S/O H.BHYRASIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS AGRICULTURIST BOTH ARE R/O KONDAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA - 577 554. Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22615 WP No. 16528 of 2019 3. JAYAPPA S S/O LATE SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/O VIDHYANAGARA, HOSADURGA TOWN & TALUK, CHITRADURGA -577527. 4. HANUMANTHAPPA S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, 5. NAGAPPA S/O LATE THIMMANNA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, 6. K. BHYRALINGAPPA S/O KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, 7. CHANDRAMMA W/O SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, RESPONDENT NOS. R4 TO R7 R/O KONDAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA 577 554. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. PURANDARA.,ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2, R4 TO R7) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 06.03.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.383/2018 ON THE APPLICATION (I.A.NO.IV & V) FILED UNDER ORDER I RULE 10(2) OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSADURGA IS HEREWITH PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-H AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22615 WP No. 16528 of 2019 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled the dispute in respect of some properties and for remaining properties settlement is going on and now the parties are not showing the interest to this proceedings and have not furnished any instructions. Submission is taken on record. In view of the aforesaid submission, writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6