HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 229/2025 Mohd. Yaqoob Khan and another …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. vs UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: None. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER 10.03.2025 1. On 03.02.2025, the petitioner No. 2, who happens to be an advocate as well, had sought time to address the issue with regard to maintainability of the instant petition and the matter was ordered to be listed on 11.02.2025. 2. On 11.02.2025, due to absence of learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter could not be considered and the matter was ordered to be listed on 21.02.2025. 3. Thereafter, on 21.02.2025, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was ordered to be listed in terms of order dated 03.03.2025. 4. On 03.03.2025 also none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Same is the position today also. 5. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition, as such, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE Jammu 10.03.2025 Sahil Padha Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No. Serial No. 2 Sahil Padha 2025.03.10 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document