TUFAIL AHMED v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/1091/2025 · 2025-11-04
S Q H Rizvi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177089 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177089 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1091 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Ms. Kaneez Fatima, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sanjeev Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Badrish Kumar Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents, Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Village Baramjeet Pur Judupur Pargana Miranpur, Tehsil-Sadar, District Sultanpur through its Village Pradhan, and perused the record.
2. By means of the present petition in the nature of public interest litigation, the petitioner has prayed for writ in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties concerned to remove the unauthorized possession/constructions from the public utility land having Gata No. 130, area 0.5540 Hectare and Gata No. 132 area 0.380 hectare, situated at Village Baramjeet Pur Judupur, Pargana Miranpur, Tehsil Sadar, District Sultanpur.
3. The submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that opposite party nos. 6 & 7 have illegally encroached upon the public utility land.
4. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel on the basis of the written instructions dated 30.10.2025 provided by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Sultanpur, has made a statement at the Bar that the proceedings under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 have already been initiated against the opposite party Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Tufail Ahmed .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
nos. 6 & 7 and next date in the matter is fixed on 18.11.2025 before the Court of concerned Tehsildar.
5. In view of the statement as made by the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, there is nothing left to be adjudicated in the present public interest litigation, at this stage. Accordingly, without adverting on the merits of the case, the present petition is consigned to the records. November 4, 2025 Arun WPIL No. 1091 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench