MOHD.RABE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/5942/2025 · 2025-11-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177088 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177088 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5942 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Shri Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 33/2025, under U/s 137(2), 87, 64(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 5/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Police Station - Salon, District - Raibareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in terms of the FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was taken away by the applicant and wrong was also committed. The age of the victim is 17 years and 08 months and it was stated that on false pretext of marriage, she was taken to Bombay. Subsequently, in the statement under Section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that both of them made physical relations and both of them had gone to Pratapgarh where they stayed together. It is also stated that they were talking for the last seven or eight months. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS, the victim stated that both of them had gone to Vasi Station where they stayed overnight and physical relations were formed. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the statement and age of the victim i.e. 17 years and 08 months coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Verma, Praveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Alok Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Shubham Pal Mohd.Rabe .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
28.01.2025 and has no criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Mohd.Rabe be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.
20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 10, 2025 Mohit Singh/- BAIL No. 5942 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench