Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177072 (ALL)

PRAKASH TEWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/13940/2025 · 2025-12-02

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13940 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite party No.1. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party Nos.2 to 5. 3. Liberty is granted to petitioner to correct the nomenclature of opposite party No.2 during the course of day. 4. Petition has been filed challenging order of punishment dated 03.05.2025. Other concomitant prayers have also been made. 5. However, it is admitted by learned counsel for petitioner that an appeal has already been preferred against impugned order dated 10.07.2025 which has not been decided till date. 6. In view of such submissions being made, opposite party No.2, i..e, The General Manager, Jal Kal Department, Nagar Nigam, Aishbagh, Lucknow is directed to decide petitioner's pending appeal, expeditiously, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon him. Petitioner shall annexe a copy of memorandum of appeal alongwith certified copy of this order. 7. With the aforesaid direction(s), petition stands disposed of. December 2, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Prasad Shukla, Aparna Pandey, Pallavi Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sankalp Dewari (Manish Mathur,J.) Prakash Tewari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench