[2025:RJ-JP:22805] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2608/2025 1. Kuldeep Meena Son Of Shri Ramdhan Meena, Resident Of Village Dhand, Police Station Baijupada, District Dausa (Raj). 2. Manisha Wife Of Shri Kuldeep Meena, Resident Of Village Dhand, Police Station Baijupada, District Dausa (Raj). 3. Rajpal Meena Son Of Shri Ramswaroop Meena, Resident Of Village Rahuwas, Police Station Rahuwas, District Dausa (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Bhupendra Raghav Son Of Shri Bijendra Raghav, Resident Of Lili, Police Station Laxmangarh District Alwar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal, Ms. Shweta Sharma, (Mr. Rajpal Meena and Ms. Manisha are present in person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP Mr. Laxman Meena, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 30/05/2025 1. The present S.B. criminal misc. petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the FIR No.152/2025, registered at Police Station Laxmangarh (Alwar), District Alwar for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 125, 352, 307, 324(4), 329(3) and 303(2) of BNS on the basis of compromise effectuated between the petitioners and the complainant/respondent No.2 Bhupendra Raghav. [2025:RJ-JP:22805] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-2608/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the compromise entered between the parties is placed on record as Annexure-2 which bears the signature of the petitioners and complainant/respondent No.2- Bhupendra Raghav. The offences under Sections 115(2) and 125(2) are compoundable, therefore, in the light of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramavtar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in AIR 2021 SC 5228, the FIR lodged against the petitioners may be quashed. 3. Mr. Laxman Meena, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 concedes that the respondent has entered into compromise with the petitioners. Respondent No.2 Bhupendra Raghav is present in person and he has no objection, if the proceedings against the petitioners are quashed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report dated 27.05.2025, which contains the fact that no such document of compromise was produced before the Investigating Officer. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. All the parties i.e., respondent No.2 Bhupendra Raghav who lodged the FIR against the petitioners injured Mahendra and Upendra, petitioner No.1 Kuldeep Meena, his wife petitioner No.2 Manisha and petitioner No.3 Rajpal Meena are present in person before this Court. They are duly identified by their counsel Girish Khandelwal and Mr. Laxman Meena. Respondent No.2 Bhupendra Raghav and injured Mahendra and Upendra have stated before this Court that they do not wish to pursue the FIR/proceedings against the petitioners. None of the injuries sustained to the [2025:RJ-JP:22805] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-2608/2025] injured were found dangerous to life or life threatening, therefore, considering the above facts and in the light of judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Gian Singh (Supra) and Ramavtar (Supra). The proceedings initiated against the petitioners in FIR No. 152/2025 registered at Police Station Laxmangarh (Alwar), District Alwar and all subsequent proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR are hereby quashed and set aside. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/20