Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177068 (ALL)

MANISH KUMAR @ GOLU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/12395/2025 · 2025-12-10

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12395 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. It has been submitted that only general allegations have been levelled against the applicant and there is no role of firing. Learned counsel for applicant further submits that the co-accused namely, Kamal Srivastava has been granted bail by this Court on 21.11.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.10883 of 2025. Co-accused Himanshu Sonkar has also been enlarged on bail by this Court. The bail order is on record as Annexure No. 2 to the bail application. Thus, the applicant stands on identical footing, hence, he is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. It is lastly contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 25.09.2025. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Kumar Singh, Amit Chopra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish Kumar @ Golu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) On due consideration of aforesaid, the applicant is languishing in jail since 25.09.2025 and the bail order of Kamal Srivastava and Himanshu Sonkar, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. Let the applicant- Manish Kumar @ Golu, involved in Case Crime/FIR No. 403 of 2025, under Section 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 109, 352, 117(2) BNS, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District-Raebareli, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 10, 2025 Vinay/- BAIL No. 12395 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench