RAM PAL @ RAM PAL GAUTAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1493/2025 · 2025-11-10
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1493 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. It is evident from the memo of the petition/application that the description of the parties has wrongly been mentioned.
2. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants requests for withdrawal of the present application with liberty to file fresh.
3. There is no objection by the other side.
4. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
5. Office is directed to return the original/certified copies of the enclosures to learned counsel for the applicants after taking photocopies of the same. November 10, 2025 Arpan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar, Suhail Kashif Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) Ram Pal @ Ram Pal Gautam And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench