SERAJ AHAMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/10719/2025 · 2025-11-11
Subhash Vidyarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10719 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Vijay Bahadur Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that because of some defects in the petition he does not want to press it and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
3. Let certified copies annexed with the petition be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies on record. November 11, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Bahadur Yadav, Ankit , Ankit Kumar Yadav, Kapil Kumar Bhargava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Seraj Ahamad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench