- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1765 WP No. 42626 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 42626 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S NARAYANSWAMY REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. NARAYANSWAMY, ULLERAHALLI VILLAGE, TEKAL POST, MALUR, KOLAR-563 130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED ARIJ PASHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SAMARTH PRAKASH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BHARATH PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED (BPCL), REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, TRANSPORT (SOUTH), RANGANATAN GARDENS, OFF 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 040. 2. BHARTH PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED(BPCL), REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER, OPERATIONS I/C (RETAIL), DEVANAGONTHI INSTALLATION, NEAR DEVANAGONTHI RAILWAY STATION, VIA KADUGODI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALORE-560 067. 3. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CHIKKABALLAPUR DEPOT, CHIKKABALAPUR DIVISION, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1765 WP No. 42626 of 2017 CHIKKABALAPUR-562 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPOT MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. VARNA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. N.J.KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 2; SRI. R.V.JAYAPRAKASH., ADVOCATE R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Syed Arif Pasha., counsel on behalf of Sri.Samarth Prakash., for the petitioner and Smt.Varna., counsel on behalf of Sri.N.J.Kumar., for respondents 1 and 2 have appeared in person. Sri.R.V.Jayaprakash., counsel for respondent No.3 has appeared through video conferencing. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the Letter/ order dated 31.07.2017 bearing No.SR.DGM.TPT.4 issued by the DGM Transport (Retail), South vide Annexure-A. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1765 WP No. 42626 of 2017 4. A perusal of Annexure-A reflects that it's a communication issued to the petitioner. If at all the petitioner has any grievance, it can suitably reply to the same. I decline to exercise power under Writ jurisdiction. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 33