APHC010243312023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 12810/2023 Between: 1. PANDARI CHENGAIAH, S/O.KANJA AGE 44 YEARS, R/O. CHOWATAPALEM VILLAGE GUDUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUDUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUDUR RURAL POLICE STATION GUDURI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in continuing the name of petitioner on the rolls of Suspect sheet vide Suspect Sheet No. 7/1999 as illegal, contrary to the Police Standing Order 742 and also in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Arts.14 and 21 of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the respondents to forthwith remove the name of petitioner from History sheet and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in continuing the name of petitioner on the rolls of Suspect sheet vide Suspect Sheet No.7/1999 as illegal, contrary to the Police Standing Order 742 and also in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Arts.14 and 21 of Constitution of India and Consequently, direct the respondents to forthwith remove the name of petitioner from History sheet and to pass ....” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Police on instructions would submit that no rowdy sheet is opened against the Petitioner and this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is allowed. The Proceedings of suspect Sheet No.7/1999 issued by respondent authorities are hereby set aside. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 12810 of 2023 08.09.2025 Mjl /*