VINEET KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
/11510/2025 · 2025-12-09
Abdul Moin, Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177035 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177035 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11510 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents no.1 to 3.
2. Notice to respondents no.4 to 6 is dispensed with in view of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to conduct fair and proper investigation in pursuance to FIR No. 249 of 2025, under Sections 324(4), 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow.
4. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Mubin Ali, Sub- Inspector, Police Station Kakori, Lucknow, states that a final report dated 15.9.2025 has been prepared in the matter.
5. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedy as may be available to them under law.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 9, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Malti Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Vineet Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench