Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010181352025 2025:GAU-AS:11127 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2651/2025 HD ENGINEERING AND SERVICES A FIRM REGD. UNDER THE MEDIUM ENTERPRISES DEVELOPMENT ACT 2006, REP. BY ITS PARTNER, HIRAK JYOTI BHUYAN, ASIDC HEAD OFFICE COMPLEX, BAMUNIMAIDAM, NEAR GUWAHATI COLLEGE BUS STOP, OPPOSITE SHANI MANDIR, GUWAHATI-21, ASSAM VERSUS POWERGRID CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANR REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, SAUDAMINI PLOT NO-2, SECTOR 29, NEAR IFFCO CHOWK, GURGAON (HARYANA), PIN- 122001 2:EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR POWERGRID CORPORATION LIMITED SURUJ NAGAR PATH NOTUN BAZAR ODALBAKRA KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S ARAFAT, Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : WP(C)/3578/2024 HD ENGINEERING AND SERVICES A FIRM REGD. UNDER THE MEDIUM ENTERPRISES DEVELOPMENT ACT Page No.# 2/4 2006 REP. BY ITS PARTNER HIRAK JYOTI BHUYAN ASIDC HEAD OFFICE COMPLEX BAMUNIMAIDAM NEAR GUWAHATI COLLEGE BUS STOP OPPOSITE SHANI MANDIR GUWAHATI-21 ASSAM VERSUS POWERGRID CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANR REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR SAUDAMINI PLOT NO-2 SECTOR 29 NEAR IFFCO CHOWK GURGAON (HARYANA) PIN-122001 2:EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR POWERGRID CORPORATION LIMITED SURUJ NAGAR PATH NOTUN BAZAR ODALBAKRA KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM ------------ Advocate for the applicant(s): Mr. K Das Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. T Marngar Page No.# 3/4 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 18.08.2025 Heard Mr. K Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and Mr. T Marngar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2. The petitioner herein who is the applicant had filed the instant application seeking impleadment of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 of the instant application to the accompanying writ petition on the ground that the petitioner made supplies to the respondent No.1 of the writ petition through the respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the present application. The applicant therefore, submits that the said respondent Nos.1 and 2 of the instant application be arrayed at the respondent Nos.3 and 4 respectively in the accompanying writ petition. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 of the accompanying writ petition submits that he has no objection to the prayer made in the instant application. 4. Taking into account the above, the instant application stands allowed thereby arraying the respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the instant application as respondent Nos.3 and 4 to the accompanying writ petition. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant is directed to file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court within 7(seven) days from today and the Registry on the basis thereof shall make the necessary correction in the cause-title and update the same in the CIS. Page No.# 4/4 6. Interlocutory application accordingly, stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant