SARVJIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND 2 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.DEPTT.CIVIL SECTT.andORS
WRIA/7678/2017 · 2025-10-31
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177013 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177013 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 7678 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 31, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sarvjit Kumar Srivastava And 2 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Deptt.Civil Sectt.Andors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench