Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17701 (AP)

V.K.HEMALATHA v. GRANDHI BALA KRISHNA

CRP/756/2021 · 2025-06-30

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

V APHC010243272021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI QMS TUESDAY THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE I PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 756 OF 2021 Petition under Article 211 of the Constitution of India, Civil Revision delay in deciding the on 13.09.2017, on the file of 1st AddI Senior Civil Petition having been aggrieved by the abnormal O.S.No.264/2017 filed Judge.SPSR Nellore Dist. Between: V.K.Hemalatha D/o G.Palmer No102,Sunshine Apartment, 4th Main Lane, Magunta Layout. Central Avenue. SPSR Nellore Dist. Age,68yrs, Occ. Housewife, R/o Flat ...PETITIONER/S AND Grandhi Bala Krishna, ,S/o Kodandaramaiah,Age.3l Sathyabama Silks,R/o D.No.17-287,Opp Mayuri Nellore-524001,SPSR Nellore Dist Yrs,Occ.Business Prop. Restaurant ,Trunk Road, ...RESPONDENT/S ¥0 ! il ; f lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Art 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the Certified Copy of the docket Orders passed in filing of docket order dated O.S.No.264/2017 on the file of the 1"‘ AddI Senior Civil Judge SPSR on 13.09.2017, on the file of 1st AddI Senior Civil Judge, SPSR Nellore Dist. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI JANARDHANA REDDY PONAKA Counsel for the Respondent : SRI SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010243272021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE BfflH [3505] m PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 756/2021 I i Between; 1.V.K.HEMALATHA, OCC.HOUSEWIFE APARTMENT, 4 AVENUE, SPSR NELLORE DIST. 68YRS, SUNSHINE MAIN LANE, MAGUNTA LAYOUT, CENTRAL ...PETITIONER AGE D/0.G.PALMER, R/O.FLAT NO102 TH AND 1.GRANDH1 BALA KRISHNA, S/o.Kodandaramaiah, Age 31Yrs, Occ.Business, Prop.Sathyabama Silks, R/o D.No.17-287, Opp Mayuri Restaurant, Trunk Road, NelIore-524001, SPSR Nellore District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved by the abnormal delay in deciding the 0.S.No.264/2017filed on 13.09.2017, on the file of 1st ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE.SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of docket order dated O.S.No.264/2017 filed on 13.09.2017 on the file of I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner; 1. JANARDHANA REDDY PONAKA Counsel for the Respondent; 1.SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATl The Court made the following: 2 jr U THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 756 of 2021 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. SD/- M.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT |REGISTRAR Li—— SECTION OFFI^ //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The 1st Addl. Civil Judge. (Senior Division) SPSR Nellore Dist. 2. One CC to Sri. Janardhana Reddy Ponaka Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. Sivaprasad Reddy Venati Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi 5. Three CD Copies at MKP TAC \ HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 756 OF 2021 I 25 SEP 2025 ^ ^ Currant Section . CRP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS