RAMESH KUMAR NISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/9613/2025 · 2025-11-19
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177003 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177003 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9613 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the present petition with liberty to file a fresh annexing the statements collected by the Investigating Officer as well as the order sheet explaining the status of trial of the case in question.
2. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the enclousers after taking photocopy of the same.
3. The writ petition is hereby dismissed as not pressed. November 19, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shubham Gupta, Amul Mani Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) Ramesh Kumar Nishad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench