Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176997 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

/2409/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2409 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Vivek Chandra, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.491 of 2024 under Sections 140, 103(2) BNS, P.S.- Mallawan, District- Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused, namely, Ramratan has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 24.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.472 of 2025. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 4. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the informant has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in para 4-7 of the order dated 24.11.2025, ground of parity, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 21.11.2024 and has no criminal history, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Ajay Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Farhan Alam Osmany, Anjali Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vivek Chandra Ajay Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 2409 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench