Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176989 (ALL)

RAMESH CHANDRA RASTOGI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTT. MAGISTRATE BAHRAICH AND 5 OTHERS

/12000/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12000 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. In the present writ petition, the lis that has been raised by the petitioner is already being contested by the petitioner in a civil suite. 2. In light of the same, we are of the view that no interference is warranted under the writ jurisdiction. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the civil Court for obtaining order with regard to his grievances. 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. December 16, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar, Ranjeet Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ramesh Chandra Rastogi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Bahraich And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench