RAM SHAKAL UPADHYAY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/4568/2016 · 2025-11-14
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4568 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 14, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhaskar Pratap Dubey, Brihaspati Mani Pathak, Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Shitla Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Shakal Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench