Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176983 (ALL)

RAMU SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/1819/2025 · 2025-10-30

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1819 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.471 of 2024, under Section 64(2)K of BNS, P.S. Reusa, District Sitapur. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant aged about 22 years was mentally challenged and the applicant caught hold of her and was trying to commit wrong on her which was seen by certain children after which the applicant ran away. In the statement made before the medical authorities, the allegations as levelled were that the applicant was lying on the victim; no allegation of penetrative sexual assault was levelled. Medical report on record also did not corroborate the allegation of force being used or penetrative sexual assault. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the aforesaid, the applicant who is in custody since 28.09.2024 and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ramu Shukla be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Kanaujia, Archana Yadav, Tufail Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramu Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 30, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 1819 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench