HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10194 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that all the payments that have been directed to be made by the Court including the interest and solatium has been made to the petitioner. 3. In light of the same, we are of the view that the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the State is correct and therefore, the petitioner have no interest as no cause of action remains. 4. Accordingly, the matter is consigned to record. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. December 2, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjay Tripathi, Vatsala Singh (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Devi Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Competent Authority Special Land Acquistion Officer Barabanki And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench