K.JAGAN v. The State Rep By The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/34153/2025 · 2025-12-15
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176975 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176975 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 34153 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 34153 of 2025 K.Jagan Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By The Inspector of Police CBCID Vellore Police Station, Vellore district. (Crime No.04 of 2025) Respondent(s) PRAYER This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNS, seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in in Crime No. 04 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): K Sathish Kumar For Intervenor Mr.Prakash Adiapadam For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 318(2), 318(4) of BNS, in Crime No.04 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 34153 of 2025 2.The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joined hands with other accused involved in the iridium scam, wherein they promised that they were likely to have a huge mineral value iridium with them and to encash the same, they needed financial assistance from others, and accordingly collected a sum of Rs.23 lakhs from five persons. Further, it is stated that the petitioner alone has separately collected Rs.21 lakhs. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the alleged transactions were took place some years back and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent reported that this petitioner alone has collected a sum of Rs.21 lakhs and the investigation in this case is pending. Hence, he opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the nature of the scam committed by the petitioner and the huge amount of Rs.23/- lakhs involved in this case, and since so far no money has been recovered and petitioner alone collected a sum of Rs.21 lakhs, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 34153 of 2025 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
15-12-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 34153 of 2025 To 1.The State Rep By The Inspector of Police CBCID Vellore Police Station, Vellore district. (Crime No.04 of 2025) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 34153 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 34153 of 2025
15-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis