ARCHANA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/13460/2025 · 2025-11-20
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13460 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2 Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 3, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 & 5 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"(a) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to pay the petitioner the salary, pay-scale, and all consequential benefits of the post of Headmaster, with effect from the date she was entrusted with the charge i.e. from the year 2009-2016 and then 1st April 2022, and to continue paying her the same regularly every month. (b) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to calculate and release all arrears of salary, including allowances, increments, and all consequential financial benefits accrued due to the petitioner's continuous discharge of duties as Headmaster; (e) Issue any other writ, order, or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case; and (f) Award the costs of this petition to the petitioner" After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 4 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Navneet Yadav, Aahuti Agarwal, Mohd. Yasir Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh, Uday Veer Singh Archana Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no.
4/District Basic Education Officer, Gonda is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 20, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 13460 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench