2025:HHC:30868 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPIL No.46 of 2025 Decided on: 08.09.2025. __________________________________________________________ Balbir Singh & Another ...Petitioners Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & ...Respondents Others Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioners: Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the respondents: Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 7-State. Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, for respondents No.8 to 13. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice [Oral] The challenge in the present Public Interest Litigation was to the revocation of suspension order dated 30.05.2025 [Annexure P-1]. 2. It has been noticed that regular inquiry had also been completed and show cause notices have been issued. 3. Counsel for the State has now placed on record the reply showing that the orders have been passed. On the basis of regular inquiry, misconduct was found established 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:30868 - 2 - and removal from service has been ordered against the elected Panchayat Members under Section 146(2) of the H.P. Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 4. In view of the above, the present Public Interest Litigation has been rendered infructuous. 5. Needless to say, any observation made by us in this context shall not prejudice the authority while deciding the appeal of the private respondents. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 08, 2025 [Shivender/Bhardwaj]