Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176957 (ALL)

KAPIL MUNI SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY./ ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME, LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/12805/2025 · 2025-11-04

Manish Mathur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12805 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding opposite party no.2 i.e. Director General, Youth Welfare and Prantiya Rakshak Dal (P.R.D.), Lucknow to expeditiously consider and take the decision on the report dated 20.12.2024 submitted by opposite party no.4, taking into account the correct date of birth of petitioner as 07.07.1971, which has been duly verified by the competent committee and to pass appropriate order for deployment of the petitioner as Prantiya Rakshak Dal (P.R.D.) Guard in accordance with law in the interest of justice. " "to issue a writ, order or direction declaring that the date of birth of petitioner is 07.07.1971 as per valid documents i.e. high school mark sheet, certificate, transfer certificate and the medical report and direct the concerned authorities to make necessary correction in the service record including the nominal roll register of the petitioner." 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that an enquiry was conducted with regard to said grievance of petitioner and report was submitted in favour of petitioner, which are pending consideration with opposite party no.2. 4. In view of aforesaid facts and since factual aspects would require to be considered, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director General, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prasiddha Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kapil Muni Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy./ Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home, Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Youth Welfare and Prantiya Rakshak Dal (P.R.D.), Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be considered and decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order in the light of reports submitted, within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 4, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 12805 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench