SHAHZAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/10008/2025 · 2025-12-03
Indrajeet Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176937 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176937 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10008 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
1. Sri Rizwanuddin Ahmad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos.2 & 3, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Mahesh Pal Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 & 3 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed seeking quashment of the impugned chargesheet dated 14/01/2024 filed under Sections 363, 366 IPC and Section 3(2) (v) SC/ST Act as well as entire proceeding of S.T. No.10 of 2024 pending before Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Balrampur. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute by way of compromise dated 10.09.2024. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.3 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mahendra Pal Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shahzad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same.
(Indrajeet Shukla) December 3, 2025 S.P. A482 No. 10008 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench