Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176931 (ALL)

AKHILESH SINGH AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A482/2582/2025 · 2025-11-26

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2582 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 and 3. 2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 13.10.2023 as well as cognizance order dated 10.01.2024 passed in Case No. 1065 of 2024 arising out of F.I.R. No. 222 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 376, 323 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Aliganj, District Lucknow and its entire proceedings. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 and 3 jointly submit that in pursuance of the earlier order dated 30.01.2025 passed in Application u/s 482 No. 895 of 2025, the matter was sent before the court below for verification of the compromise deed. 4. It is evident from the record that the factum of the compromise has been verified by the court below vide his report dated 12.02.2025. The compromise deed is appended as Annexure 5 to the application, which goes to show that respondent nos. 2 and 3 do not want to prosecute the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hemant Kumar Mishra, Abhishek Mishra, Arti Ganguly Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Prabhu Sharan, Rajesh Kumar Sharma Akhilesh Singh And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned A.G.A. fairly concedes that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court below. 6. Hon'ble Apex Court, in catena of decisions, viz., Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further and the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter any further. 8. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. 9. Charge sheet dated 13.10.2023 as well as cognizance order dated 10.01.2024 passed in Case No. 1065 of 2024 arising out of F.I.R. No. 222 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 376, 323 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Aliganj, District Lucknow and its entire proceedings are hereby quashed. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned, forthwith. November 26, 2025 VKS A482 No. 2582 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench