Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17693 (GAU)

PASHUPATI DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

WP(C)/4660/2025 · 2025-08-28

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010182182025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4660/2025 PASHUPATI DAS S/O- LATE LANKESWAR DAS, R/O- MILANPUR, P.O. MILANPUR, P.S. AND DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN- 781337. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22 P.O. KHANAPARA P.S. DISPUR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN- 781022 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. J. Dutta, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. Gogoi, Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate, Assam BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 29-08-2025 Heard Mr. N. J. Dutta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Page No.# 2/2 Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. Pursuant to the orders being passed by this Court on 14.08.2025, 20.08.2025, 21.08.2025 and 27.08.2025, the State respondents have filed an affidavit stating interalia that, keeping in tune with Clause 4.1.1.2 as well as the Assam Procurement Reference Policy, 2021, an additional corrigendum has been issued on 26.08.2025, whereby the Minimum Average Turnover for the last three years as mentioned in Clause 4 of the Additional Terms and Conditions in connection with Tender No. PRI.634353/Pt/23 (Supply of Dietary articles under Zone-5 jails of Assam during the Financial Year 2025-26) dated 06-08-2025 as Rs. 5 crore in respect of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME). 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioner is no longer aggrieved with Clause 4 of the Additional Terms and Conditions of the said tender. 4. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains before this Court for adjudication, for which the instant writ petition stands closed. 5. Interim orders, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant