APHC010243352023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12952/2023 Between: 1. KOTA PAVAN KUMAR, S/O. GOPALAYYA AGE 44 YEARS, R/ O. POTUPALEM VILLAGE GUDUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUDUR RURAL POLICE STATION TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in continuing the name of petitioner on the rolls of Suspect sheet vide Suspect Sheet No. 136/2017 as illegal, contrary to the Police Standing Order 742 and also in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Art 14 and 21 of Constitution 2 of India and Consequently direct the respondents to forthwith remove the name of petitioner from History sheet and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the respondents not to insist the petitioner to appear before the 4th respondent without any prior notice or not to visit the house of the petitioner pending disposal of main Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in continuing the name of petitioner on the rolls of Suspect sheet vide Suspect Sheet No. 136/2017 as illegal, contrary to the Police Standing Order 742 and also in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the respondents to forthwith remove the name of petitioner from History sheet and to pass.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, by way of counter affidavit, would submit that the cases registered against the Petitioner were ended in acquittal. It is further stated that, to curb and curtail the unlawful activities of the Petitioner in the vicinity, suspect sheet was opened against the Petitioner. 3. Sri K.Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no cases are pending against the petitioner. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned Suspect sheet vide Suspect Sheet No. 136/2017, against the Petitioner is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.09.2025 MH 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 112 W.P.No.12952 of 2023 Dt.01.09.2025 MH