RAMTEJ YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY., HOME, LUCKNOW
BAIL/9978/2023 · 2025-12-10
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9978 of 2023 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. In the prosecution case, it is alleged that although the accused owned 0.63 hectares of land, he fraudulently sold 0.101 hectare to the complainant by committing forgery and cheating. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the dispute is purely civil in nature. The applicant has no criminal antecedents and is in custody since 16.04.2023. The offence is triable by the Magistrate, and the charge sheet has already been filed. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. Considering that the charge sheet has been filed, the offence is triable by the Magistrate, and the applicant is in custody since 16.04.2023 without any criminal history, this Court finds it a fit case for granting bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Ramtej Yadav, involved in Case Crime No. 139 of 2023, Under Section: 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station: Jaidpur, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amar Singh, Suhail Kashif Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramtej Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Home, Lucknow .....Opposite Party(s)
District: Barabanki, be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial.
December 10, 2025 R.C.
BAIL No. 9978 of 2023 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench