SALONI DHANWARE AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
/11100/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176885 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 176885 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11100 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Petitioner no.1 is present in person. She states that she wants to argue the petition.
2. Petition has been filed by the two petitioners of which it has been indicated that the petitioner no.1 is appearing in person. The status of the other petitioner i.e. petitioner no.2 is not known.
3. Petition has been filed contending that the petitioner nos.1 & 2 want to reside together. However, the version of the petitioner no.2 is not known to the Court. Consequently, there cannot be any occasion of compelling the petitioner no.2 to reside along with petitioner no.1 particularly when his stand is not known and only the petitioner no.1 has pressed the petition.
4. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition stands dismissed leaving it open to the petitioners to either file afresh or avail appropriate remedy as available. November 24, 2025 Abhishek Gupta Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Saloni Dhanware And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench