Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 176884 (ALL)

RUPESH KUMAR SRIVATAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/1313/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1313 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C./482 BNSS has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in Case Crime/FIR No.172 of 2024, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC, Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the main accused has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 29.4.2025 and the co-accused with similar allegation has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 18.10.2024. 4. Considering the fact that the main accused has been enlarged on bail, the applicant is granted the benefit of anticipatory bail. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly disposed of. 5. In the event of arrest, let the applicant - Rupesh Kumar Srivastava be released on anticipatory bail till the filing of report in aforesaid FIR number till the filing of report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.5000/- each separately to the satisfaction of trial Court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Saroj, Keshav Ram, Mohammad Kajal , Neeraj Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rupesh Kumar Srivatava .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with the investigation; (b) The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court; (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 Anupam ABAIL No. 1313 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench