- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2985 RFA No. 1369 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1369 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MAHADEVAMMA W/O LATE MADANAIKA, SINCE DIED; (APPELLANT NO.2 & 3 ALREADY ON RECORD) 2. DODDASIDDA S/O MADANAIKA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. SHEENA S/O MADANAIKA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, APPELLANTS 2 AND 3 ARE R/AT YELACHAGERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NANJANGUDU TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT-571 301. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VINAY HOSMATH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. CHIKKADEVAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKARANGANAIKA, DEAD BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, a) SMT. RAJESHWARI W/O LATE MAHADEV, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, (DAUGHTER IN-LAW OF LATE CHIKKARANGANAIKA) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2985 RFA No. 1369 of 2018 b) SHASHIKUMAR GRAND SON OF LATE CHIKKARANGANAIKA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, c) VARADARAJU S/O LATE CHIKKARANGANAIKA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, d) JAGADEESH S/O LATE CHIKKARANGANAIKA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, e) SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKARANGANAIKA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, f) SMT. GEETHA D/O LATE CHIKKARANGANAIKA, W/O GANESH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PROPOSED LEGAL REPRESENTATITVES OF CHIKKADEVAMMA AND ALL ARE R/AT YELACHAGERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NANJANAGUDU TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT, PINCODE NO. 571 301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI GOWDAR., ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED LR'S OF DECEASED R1 AS R1(a TO f) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2985 RFA No. 1369 of 2018 ORAL ORDER Sri.Vinay Hosmath., counsel on behalf of Sri.D.S.Hosmath., for the appellants has appeared in person. Counsel for the appellants submits that a memo has been filed stating that the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the memo. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the memo. When queried, counsel for the appellants submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the appellants about the disposal of the appeal in terms of the memo and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the appellants and the memo is placed on record. The Regular First Appeal is disposed of in terms of the memo. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40